Yes, there are many reasons to be concerned about the roll-out of 5G and how it might impact our health.
But in my humble opinion as someone who has been studying EMFs and their health effects full time for several years, the fears over 5G have been distracting activists, the public and the few politicians who actually care about this matter from the real issue we’re facing globally:
The irresponsible, reckless way we’ve been rolling out unsafe technologies in the last century, ranging from wireless radiation to simple household electricity.
This article will try to illustrate why I hold this opinion which I understand may seem controversial at first.
Fact #1: Even Without 5G, You’re Still Exposed to Electro-Pollution Levels a QUINTILLION Times Higher Than Ancestral Levels
I’ve been an advocate for safe technologies for years. I’m completely against 5G, and applaud all the efforts I’ve seen put forward to slow down or stop its rollout.
But the unfortunate fact is that even if 5G disappears from the surface of the planet… we’ll still be exposed to previous generations of cellular networks (2G, 3G, 4G-LTE) that are themselves completely unsafe — and at levels of exposure that are a quintillion times (1,000,000,000,000,000 X) higher than what your great-grandparents were exposed to back in the 1920s.
Image credit: Simplified version of a 2012 graphic by the work of Philips and Lamburn.
See the original image here for a more thorough portrait.
This bears repeating: There are no known “safe” levels of electro-pollution. In reality, scientists have found biological effects at power levels that are orders of magnitude smaller than what a smartphone or wifi router is routinely emitting.
More than 50 years ago, studies like the 1965 The Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System [1] by W. Bergman had already confirmed that extremely low levels of electro-pollution can have important impacts on biology.
As reported by Professors Johansson and Flydal [2]:
“Bergman revealed all we need to conclude that radiowaves in the centimeter band influence blood circulation, respiration, temperature control, water balance, albumin and sugar concentration in the cerebro-spinal fluid, and so on.
The dosages Bergman considered are significantly below today’s maximum exposure standards. [emphasis mine] Even electromagnetic fields (EMF) at levels of only 1/100,000th (10-5) of what we are regularly exposed to from mobiles, are found to disturb the complex electrical operations taking place at cellular levels, and to cause damage to DNA, proteins, neurons and oxidation processes.”
Fact #2: This Landmark Study Confirmed That 2G & 3G Were Already Carcinogenic
In early 2018, the results of a 20 year long saga finally came in. The National Toxicology Program (NTP), a federal interagency group under the National Institutes of Health, studied large groups of rats and mice in order to find out if the radiofrequency radiation emitted by cell phones, wifi and Bluetooth devices is carcinogenic… or not.
The conclusion was unequivocal: There is “Clear Evidence” that these disruptive signals are carcinogenic in rats [3].
Unsurprisingly, the FDA — who had nominated cell phone radiation to the NTP in 1999 — swept those results under the rug, arguing that “these findings should not be applied to human cell phone usage” and that “[they] believe the existing safety limits for cell phones remain acceptable for protecting the public health”. [4]
But here’s the twist: In the NTP study, rats and mice were exposed to older 2G and 3G signals emitted by signal generators — not real cell phones which now emit much stronger, and much more disruptive 4G-LTE radiation.
This is especially concerning for two reasons:
a) This clearly shows us that the speed at which we are able to roll out new unsafe technologies is way faster than our ability to study them. By the time we’re able to study 4G, we’ll likely already have been exposed to 5G, 6G and beyond.
b) It’s well recognized that signals emitted by signal generators (“simulated EMF-emissions”) are much less disruptive to biology compared to real wireless devices such as a smartphone.
In their 2015 review, Panagopoulos and his colleagues explain that [5]:
“While experimental studies employing simulated EMF-emissions present a strong inconsistency among their results with less than 50% of them reporting effects, studies employing real mobile phone exposures demonstrate an almost 100% consistency in showing adverse effects. [emphasis mine] This consistency is in agreement with studies showing association with brain tumors, symptoms of unwellness, and declines in animal populations.
[…] We conclude that, in order for experimental findings to reflect reality, it is crucially important that exposures be performed by commercially available mobile phone handsets.”
Previous generations of cellular networks are clearly unsafe, and so are all types of wireless devices including wifi routers, Bluetooth-enabled headphones or wearables, “smart” utility meters, and countless others.
Fact #3: Higher Frequencies Are Not Necessarily More Dangerous
There are many reasons to believe that 5G frequencies in the higher “millimeter wave” range will be just as unsafe as all previous wireless technologies.
In her 2018 review “5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications☆” [6], Dr. Cindy Russell reviewed the available literature on millimeter waves and concluded:
“[..] The addition of this added high frequency 5G radiation to an already complex mix of lower frequencies, will contribute to a negative public health outcome both from both physical and mental health perspectives.
[…] Because this is the first generation to have cradle-to-grave lifespan exposure to this level of man-made microwave (RF EMR) radiofrequencies, it will be years or decades before the true health consequences are known. Precaution in the roll out of this new technology is strongly indicated.”
But I also feel that the myopic focus on millimeter waves I’ve seen in a lot of anti-5G articles I’ve read this year has created the false impression that higher frequencies are “very dangerous”, while lower frequencies are “less dangerous” or even “safe”.
This is not scientifically correct. As my colleague and top EMF mitigation specialist Brian Hoyer reminded me recently, the visible light spectrum ranges from 375,000 to 769,000 GHz in frequency!
As I’ve discussed in length with top EMF engineer Pawel Wypychowski on my podcast “Smarter Tech” [7], what makes certain types of electromagnetic fields more disruptive or stressful than others is not necessarily their intensity (power) or even frequency, but other characteristics that make them completely foreign to our biological “sensors”, such as:
- Pulsation
- Modulation
- Polarization
- Other complex engineering technique that modify signals to improve connectivity, such as the new techniques used with 5G
For this reason, I think we should be just as concerned about the lower-frequency 5G towers that are being installed everywhere, and all other sources of wireless radiation, than we are about these millimeter waves.
What Now? How Can You Protect Yourself?
I know from experience that the entire topic of how we can deal with electro-pollution (EMFs) may feel overwhelming and scary at first. This is how I felt years ago before I decided to dedicate my life to try and fix this global problem.
But I also recognize that knowing exactly what you can do about it — and taking action on that information — can lead to a greater sense of empowerment and relief.
Here’s what you can do to protect yourself — and future generations — from this growing problem:
1) Help spread awareness about ALL sources of electro-pollution, not just 5G.
5G awareness has exploded this year and stirred a lot of controversy, but I’m under the impression that things are still progressing overall.
We need these debates to happen, and we need decision makers to take a stand, but not just against 5G. They need to be asked the question: Are you against or for more electro-pollution?
If you want to stop the 5G rollout at a local level, check out 5G Crisis. For a larger discussion about what we do want, and how we should replace 5G, 6G and future wireless infrastructure with safer technologies, check out the SafeG Alliance.
2) Reduce your exposure to ALL sources of electro-pollution, not just 5G.
Cell phones, tablets, wifi routers, Bluetooth-ready devices, but also electric fields, magnetic fields, dirty electricity, and even artificial light. All these are sources of electro-pollution that can prevent you from feeling your best and achieving greater wellness.
Your goal should be to minimize your exposure to all the sources you and your family have control over, as much as you can. Aim for progress, not for perfection.
Free Webinar on 5G: You’re Invited!
If you liked my article and want to learn more, do not miss the free webinar I’m giving in collaboration with top EMF mitigation specialist Brian Hoyer this Monday May 24th at 8PM EDT.
We will do a deep dive on 5G, how it might impact your health, and teach you how to protect yourself from all sources of electro-pollution.
You can register for free at: https://electropollutionfix.com/5gweb
References
[3] https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539441/
[6] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300161
“This consistency is in agreement with studies showing association with brain tumors, symptoms of unwellness, and declines in animal populations.” A (cynical?) approach is rolling out these technologies will be matched by a decline in world population which will free the earth from the growing destruction.
If the remaining people can realize what destroyed the others, that is.
Since moment of roll out of 1,2,3 G it mean ca 1990 level of testosterone at young men bodies and fertility are dramatically decreasing. It is castration by radiation.
Fertility levels have dropped so low that I’ve seen recent articles about population levels *declining* in many countries including Japan. Scary.
There is evidence, by at least “correlation” that 5G could be the cause or one of the causes of Covid 19. Read: “The Contagion Myth” by Dr. Tom Cowan. (Barnes and Noble). You can also read the “Invisible Rainbow” by Firstenberger on the history of electricity. Also, there are helpful protections such as “Shungite” (look it up) and devices you can plug into your car and at home into your computer. They are supposed to be 100% effective. I have one in my new car. I got mine on amazon.
you can put a “faraday cage” around your smart meter to mitigate the EMF’s there is also a book or two on the science behind shungite. You can put pyramids and other shapes all around your home to mitigate the emf’s. you can also wear a pendant around the neck or a bracelet. Check it out before making any criticisms.
Sincerely, Ronald Stonis
Hey Ronald,
I’d argue that the correlation of all electro-smog (3G, 4G, LTE, 5G, Wi-Fi, etc.) with overall risk of death is way stronger than just with 5G. The focus on 5G is a bit bizarre, considering that all previous technologies had already been linked with immune system disruption.
I’ve seen some data on shungite – yes – might offer partial protection. 100% protection — I’d stay away from these claims. There harmonizing technologies probably are supportive and might help the body cope better with stress.
I do recommend a smart meter cover. One of the ways people can partially mitigate their meter.
Thanks for your feedback!
Had to jump in and say I’m just delighted to hear any voice of protest against this silent threat.
I someone missed your comment — thanks so much!!!
Hi EMF Guy! Just learning about you and your site. I’ve read about and have known for quite sometime over the decade or so about the dangers of all this electro-smog…but somehow you just get conditioned along with society to accept and forget about it all until you can’t figure out why your Tinnitus is through the roof and you generally just feel lousy most of the time even though you take good care of yourself. Could it be that 6 blocks away is a mega 5G tower that has just gone up in the last year…?! So here I am back a square one rekindling my journey and desire to be as EMF free as possible…and help others do the same. Thank you for all your insight, tips, advice and for advocating!
Glad you stumbled upon my site! EMFs are definitely a factor to take into consideration when trying to troubleshoot your health. Most ignore it.
Keep learning!
I haven’t seen anything about this subject: the effects of emfs on perishable foodstuffs, such as what you store in your refrigerator. We have reduced emfs in our environment dramatically. Before we sold our house and moved, we had a new fancy refrigerator that was supposedly not ‘smart’, but when I got my meters, I found it was emitting like crazy. Turns out all their (Samsung) units of that type are wifi enabled whether they are smart or not, and you can’t disable it.
We’d been noticing that our expensive organic produce seemed not to last as long as we felt it should. Given what the radiation does to our bodies, I was wondering if the emfs were causing the produce to spoil faster. Another thing I have noticed where we now are, is that the jar of yeast we bought died way before the expiration date, and we stored it in a good environment. So I’m wondering if the exposure living foodstuffs have in the store and such is having an effect on longevity.
I haven’t seen anything on this topic, and obviously there’s nothing we can do about exposure prior to buying it, but if my observation is correct, we really need to be outspoken on this problem.
Hi Maggie,
EMFs could make foodstuffs more perishable by prematurely dehydrating them (we know this is one of the mechanisms in humans, animals, plants), or even by just negatively impacting the water structure in veggies, fruits, etc. This is very plausible to me.
I have not seen good data about that, though. If you come across anything, please let me know.
I have seen a few studies where man-made EMFs negatively impacted water structure in a permanent way. I have also recently talked to Dr. Pawluk, one of the foremost authorities on PEMF therapy, who has reviewed the science published around PEMF and water structure and concluded that water “conditioned” with the proper magnetic fields is more hydrating and has a structure that makes it easier to absorb.
It’s therefore likely that chaotic waves negatively impact water structure and promote faster spoilage, whereas harmonious waves could do the opposite.
Nick
Hey Nick,
about car EMFs: I’m buying a car and need to make a decision really soon and deciding between a regular corolla and an hybrid corolla.
Is the EMF significant in hybrids like corolla hybrid
VS their regular counterparts (regular gasoline corolla)>
Or i shouldnt worry much?
Note i will mostly be alone driving in the driver’s seat.
I hear EMFs arent as bad in that driver seat location vs in the back.
But if there is still a significant EMF difference (that makes an actual difference) in that driver location in an hybrid
vs a regular corolla, i will buy the latter.
I need to know this asap so if you have any opinion
i’d really appreciate it!
thanks~