In this new segment of the Smarter Tech podcast, I’ll feature tech insiders who are spreading awareness on wireless safety and identifying new technologies that could help us fix these issues. In this discussion with Peter Sullivan, we dive deep into his latest work and how he envisions a future where our use of EMFs becomes orders of magnitude safer.
Discussed during this episode:
- How he personally got sick because of wireless radiation, and his journey proving that his condition was real, not imagined
- The different measurable markers that can prove EMF damage and that could help us quantify what EMF mitigation tools or tactics work best
- How a new April 2020 paper which discussed which frequencies are healing and which are harmful could change everything
- Are all EMF-harmonizing chips, pendants or other gizmos completely useless? Here’s why Peter doesn’t think so, and which ones he has found effective.
- How Peter sees the future of safe tech evolving, and whether he thinks that “low-EMF” technologies are a good idea or merely an attempt to “greenwash” the EMF issue
Links Mentioned:
- Clear Light Ventures
- Clear Light Ventures – Facebook
- Clear Light Ventures Inc. (@clearlightventures) • Instagram photos and videos
- BJ Fogg, PhD
- Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Revised Edition (8580001041766): Robert B. Cialdini: Books
- Merchants of Doubt – How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming
- American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM)
- Cindy Russell, MD
- Physicians for Safe Technology | Wireless Technology and Public Health
- Beatrice Golomb, MD, PhD
- → How much is safe?
- Mudita – Free Yourself | Mudita
- (PDF) An integral predictive model that reveals a causal relation between exposures to non-thermal electromagnetic waves and healthy or unhealthy effects
- A Pollution Fight Powered by Bioluminescent Sea Creatures
- http://www.autismone.org/
- Clear Light Ventures: Wireless and EMF Reduction for Autism
- ORIGINALS by Adam Grant
- Cryotherapy
- Nicotinamide Riboside: Benefits, Side Effects and Dosage
- Pulse oximetry
- Geofield Systems for Healthier Plants
- Noxtak Solutions
- JRS Eco-Wifi
- YouMatrix 5G
- Essential Energy Products
NOTE: This content is based on Nick’s opinion and is provided solely for entertainment purposes. You should do your own research when searching for information regarding health issues and always review the information carefully with your professional health care provider before using any of the protocols or recommendations presented on this podcast. The information provided is not intended to replace medical advice offered by a physician or other licensed health care provider.
FREE REPORT: Learn The Truth About How 5G Networks Might Impact Your Health
FREE REPORT: Learn The Truth About How 5G Networks Might Impact Your Health
Register to my educational newsletter on safe technologies & health and I’ll send you this “5G in 5 Minutes” report to your inbox as a free gift.
What about the Qi Shield by Synergy Technology?
Hey Brian, I’ve had so many people ask me about Qi, but haven’t gotten the chance to analyze what science backs up their products. Blushield, Somavedic, biogeometry, Qi and a few others have been on my radar for a long while.
What is especially difficult is that a comparison between these devices is nearly impossible. It remains unclear to me if any of these technologies can really offer “100% protection”. I’d love to see large rat studies using placebos VS the actual devices and see if there’s a change in cancer development, oxidative damage, birth weight of offsprings, fertility, etc.
What an informative interview with Peter Sullivan bringing very important. Information to light. I appreciate the references given so I can do further resarch. But the 2 of u have such expertise & hope to here more later from u both as vast topic.
Hey Wanda, I’ll have Peter on again next year for sure. Thanks for your nice feedback!
Great topic. Maybe it’s an effective approach to discuss the ways in which one might address whether these powerful machines are biologically neutral, or inert ~ or aim to make them so. Biologically, these frequencies are ‘stimulating’ to the cellular matrix, skin, eyesight, and can be destructive in excess of evolutionary thresholds. If cell walls open, if hearts beat faster, if sleep is interrupted, if sperm is destroyed, if migraines are caused, if cataracts are activated ~ clearly, nothing about this technology is neutral at this point. For me personally, I lost near perfect vision in my eye in front of these machines, and had to have my lens replaced with a piece of plastic. Also, muscles are activated in a way that is neuro-toxic. Radiation also dries out the air, and may contribute to climate disruption. Thanks for covering this.
Thanks for the great tips and an intelligent approach to dialing down these frequencies, and for reducing undesirable biological effects for greater health, well being and environmental integrity.
Excellent interview, Nick! Peter was a pleasure to listen to. Interesting concept about the possible use of quantum energy instead of wireless someday. First I’ve heard that idea before.
Glad you liked it Amanda! It was one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve had this year :)
Great interview, thank you!!
Hi Sara, glad you liked it!