{"id":2508,"date":"2023-03-06T19:07:15","date_gmt":"2023-03-07T00:07:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theemfguy.com\/?p=2508"},"modified":"2023-03-07T08:17:04","modified_gmt":"2023-03-07T13:17:04","slug":"red-pill-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theemfguy.com\/red-pill-project\/","title":{"rendered":"The EMF Red Pill Project: Influencing The \u201cInfluencers\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Many people do not understand my approach.<\/span><\/p>\n Some activists blame me for \u201cmaking money\u201d, arguing that nonprofit approaches are more virtuous.<\/span><\/p>\n Some point out that I\u2019m \u201cjust a guy\u201d, with no clear credentials that would make me credible. Someone else should be doing this job.<\/span><\/p>\n After years of self-doubt, ups, and downs, I\u2019ve finally been able to take what these detractors tell me with a <\/b>huge <\/i><\/b>grain of salt. The truth is\u2026 they simply do not understand my approach \u2013 the \u201cinfluencer\u201d approach.<\/b><\/p>\n For more than 10 years, I\u2019ve been using the brand new, exponential tools available to us on the Internet to warn the public about topics that really matter\u2026 dangers that our regulators have severely failed to protect us against.<\/span><\/p>\n It started in 2010 with how our food supply is heavily contaminated with toxins which affect our everyday lives and long term wellness. In 2016, I ended up being \u201cred pilled\u201d on EMFs, thanks to Dr. Wendy Myers, Dr. Devra Davis, Dr. Martin Blank, Dave Asprey, Evan Brand and many, many other scientists, doctors and online \u201cinfluencers\u201d who were already spreading the good word.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n After studying and publishing on EMFs for nearly 7 years, I\u2019m able to look back and see that the approach I\u2019ve been taking has been working.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Using the tools I know how to use \u2013 affiliate marketing, creating informational products (\u201cinfo products\u201d) that affiliates can make good earnings promoting, networking in health events around the world, offering podcasts and summits with topics that are brand new, controversial and exciting, and finally, using marketing and copywriting to position \u201cEMFs\u201d as a topic that is both credible, urgent and very concerning \u2013 I\u2019ve been able to:<\/span><\/p>\n I\u2019m not listing any of the above to \u201cbrag\u201d or argue that I\u2019m better than any other activist, doctor, or journalist who has been doing similar work. I\u2019m likely not.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n I know so many people in my circles who are way more articulate than I am on the legal side of EMFs, who can cite every single EMF study published in the last 20 years by heart, and whose work deserves to be widely known.<\/span><\/p>\n My point is that using the Internet \u2013 and the \u201cinfluencer\u201d model \u2013 to spread the word about an URGENT, concerning, environmental toxicity problem (electro-pollution), simply <\/span>works<\/span><\/i>. And we all need to do more of it. Now.<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s how \u2013 read on:<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n After a long preamble, I\u2019m getting to the point, I swear.<\/span><\/p>\n The reason I\u2019ve decided to write this article is because I sense that the tide is turning in the public opinion around the safety of EMFs, or lack thereof. If you\u2019re an EMF activist yourself, you may have sensed it too.<\/span><\/p>\n The conversation is shifting, faster than ever. Most people who talk about EMFs do so not to ridicule the topic, arguing that this is a \u201ctinfoil hat\u201d discussion, but to admit that they are personally concerned about the short and long term effects, and that the data around safety does NOT look good.<\/span><\/p>\n Just top of mind \u2013 here are a <\/span>few <\/span><\/i>key events that happened in the last 2 years that have been shifting the discussion around EMFs:<\/span><\/p>\n Ignoring the fact that our EMF \u201csafety\u201d guidelines are completely laughable \u2013 and that the overwhelming majority of *independent* scientists, who are real experts on EMFs and health effects, agree that we are in deep trouble \u2013 has become an increasingly difficult task.<\/span><\/p>\n As a result, many open-minded, reasonable scientists and doctors who have bothered looking at the actual scientific literature on EMFs have recently \u201cred pilled\u201d themselves. This happened to two very influential figures in the \u201chealth freedom\u201d movement in the last six months alone:<\/span><\/p>\n But a third person recently switched sides, and went from \u201cEMF silent\u201d to \u201cEMF truther\u201d. And I\u2019ve seen no one report on this potentially historical moment.<\/b><\/p>\n This person is so credible, so well connected in the mainstream scientific and medical communities, and has such a wide audience worldwide, that his influence could have massive repercussions on swaying the (online) public opinion of millions and millions of people worldwide, in a short timespan.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n For the last several years, I\u2019ve personally \u2013 and I\u2019m sure hundreds of my fellow colleagues\/activists did the same \u2013 tried to get in touch with countless doctors, health influencers, authors, attorneys, politicians, and other public figures who seemed like they could be open-minded enough to push aside their preconceived notions around EMFs (\u201cit\u2019s all tinfoil hatter garbage\u201d) and review the actual data (\u201cthere are essentially no safety standards, and very concerning indications of increase risks of cancer, fertility issues, and countless other things\u201d).<\/span><\/p>\n Most of them never responded. I may have been intercepted by gatekeepers, who knows? Or maybe it was just the fact that there\u2019s no real reason for them to re-examine a topic they consider to be 0% credible?<\/span><\/p>\n Some of them responded in a way that felt like a \u201cit\u2019s-not-you-it\u2019s-me\u201d moment: \u201cI\u2019m sorry, Nick, I don\u2019t think I\u2019m the right person to feature this topic on my podcast\/blog\/YouTube\/social media\u201d. I\u2019ve received an iteration of this response from top functional medicine doctors, top usually-holistically-minded environmentalist organizations, and many others. Ouch.<\/span><\/p>\n What they mean is that 1) they aren\u2019t convinced the topic is credible, and 2) they don\u2019t have time to actually review the scientific literature, or simply feel it\u2019ll be a waste of time.<\/b><\/p>\n One scientist \u2013 Stanford neuroscience professor <\/span>Dr. Andrew Huberman<\/span><\/a> \u2013 very recently decided to review the EMF literature, and was clearly shocked by his findings. Turns out, as I\u2019ve been trying to warn the entire world since 2017 <\/span>in my book<\/span><\/a>, that concerns over EMFs are not just for so-called \u201ctinfoil hatters\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n Why is this important?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Huberman is not only a Stanford professor (very mainstream and credible University in the USA), but makes it his personal mission to educate the public on topics that can impact health.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n He was featured several times on the Joe Rogan Experience (most widely known podcast in the world), and has a MASSIVE following on social media, and in my view, a massive influence amongst other \u201cinfluencers\u201d which include personal trainers, medical doctors, scientists and other health experts from all walks of life.<\/span><\/p>\nSeven Years Later<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
2023: Is The Tide Turning?<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
\n
Dr. Andrew Huberman: A Trojan Horse For The EMF Movement?<\/span><\/h2>\n